DETAILS, FICTION AND FISHING EXPEDITION CASE LAW

Details, Fiction and fishing expedition case law

Details, Fiction and fishing expedition case law

Blog Article

As the Supreme Court may be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has become attained, therefore the decision of the Supreme Court needs to generally be taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of the Constitution. ten. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

Case regulation is specific for the jurisdiction in which it was rendered. For illustration, a ruling in the California appellate court would not commonly be used in deciding a case in Oklahoma.

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 235/2025 (S.B.) Atif S/o Latif V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252216 Tag:The legislation enjoins the police to generally be scrupulously fair for the offender and also the Magistracy is to ensure a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the legislation and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court and from other courts However they have didn't have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court.

If your employee fails to provide a grievance notice, the NIRC may possibly dismiss the grievance petition. This is because the employer hasn't had a chance to respond to the grievance and attempt to resolve it. In certain cases, the NIRC may perhaps allow the employee to amend the grievance petilion to incorporate the grievance notice. However, this is normally only accomplished Should the employee can show that that they had a good reason for not serving the grievance notice. Inside the present case, the parties were allowed to guide evidence along with the petitioner company responded to the allegations as a result they were effectively conscious of the allegations and led the evidence as such this point is ofno use for being looked into in constitutional jurisdiction at this stage. Read more

Therefore, this petition is found to become not maintainable and is particularly dismissed along with the pending application(s), along with the petitioners could seek remedies through the civil court process as discussed supra. Read more

Generally speaking, higher courts usually do not have direct oversight over the lower courts of record, in that they cannot achieve out on their initiative (sua sponte) at any time to overrule judgments on the lower courts.

In 1996, the Nevada Division of Child and Family Services (“DCFS”) removed a 12-year outdated boy from his home to protect him from the horrible physical and sexual abuse he experienced suffered in his home, and also to prevent him from abusing other children during the home. The boy was placed within an emergency foster home, and was later shifted close to within the foster care system.

Quite a few judgments have affirmed that the mere registration of the crime does not constitute a "public interest" justification for restricting a person's liberty. Therefore, the Respondent's actions in putting the Petitioner's name about the ECL based within the criminal case are inconsistent with founded legal principles. Consequently, this petition must be allowed Read more

The DCFS social worker in charge of the boy’s case experienced the boy made a ward of DCFS, As well as in her six-month report for the court, the worker elaborated over the boy’s sexual abuse history, and stated that she planned to maneuver him from a facility into a “more homelike setting.” The court approved her plan.

This Court could interfere where the authority held the proceedings against the delinquent officer within a fashion inconsistent with the rules of natural justice or in violation of statutory rules prescribing the mode of inquiry or where the conclusion or finding reached from the disciplinary authority is based on no evidence. If your summary or finding is which include no reasonable person would have ever arrived at, the Court may perhaps interfere with the summary or maybe the finding and mold the relief to make it ideal towards the facts of each case. In service jurisprudence, the disciplinary authority will be the sole judge of facts. Where the appeal is presented, the appellate authority has coextensive power to re-value the evidence or the nature of punishment. Over the aforesaid proposition, we've been fortified because of the decision with the Supreme Court while in the case of Ghulam Murtaza Shaikh v. Chief Minister Sindh (2024 SCMR 1757). Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, more info Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 337 Order Date: 24-JAN-25 Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

As a result, this petition is hereby disposed of while in the terms stated previously mentioned. However no harassment shall be caused to both party along with the case shall be decided through the competent court of legislation if pending. Read more

The appellate court determined that the trial court experienced not erred in its decision to allow more time for information to generally be gathered via the parties – specifically regarding the issue of absolute immunity.

Normally, only an appeal accepted by the court of previous vacation resort will resolve these types of differences and, For numerous reasons, this sort of appeals tend to be not granted.

These judicial interpretations are distinguished from statutory legislation, which are codes enacted by legislative bodies, and regulatory regulation, which are established by executive companies based on statutes.

Report this page